IRTUM – Institutional Repository of the Technical University of Moldova

Comparative analysis of criminal liability in the Republic of Moldova, Germany, Ukraine, and France in the field of cultural heritage

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author URSU, Viorica
dc.contributor.author IVANOV, Iurie
dc.contributor.author MOROȘAN, Diana
dc.date.accessioned 2025-12-09T07:47:18Z
dc.date.available 2025-12-09T07:47:18Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.citation URSU, Viorica; Iurie IVANOV and Diana MOROȘAN. Comparative analysis of criminal liability in the Republic of Moldova, Germany, Ukraine, and France in the field of cultural heritage. In: Scientific Symposium with National and International Participation: ConsGeoCad, the first edition, Chişinău, Republica Moldova, 21-23 November 2024. Technical University of Moldova. Chișinău: Tehnica-UTM, 2025, vol. 2, pp. 147-205. ISBN 78-9975-64-528-7, ISBN 978-9975-64-530-0 (PDF). en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-64-528-7
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-64-530-0
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.utm.md/handle/5014/33867
dc.description.abstract The protection of cultural heritage is a vital concern for many nations, requiring robust legal frameworks to address illicit acts such as looting, vandalism, and trafficking of cultural artifacts. This study comparatively examines the criminal liability for offenses against cultural heritage in the Republic of Moldova, Ukraine, France, and Germany. In the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, both countries grapple with transitional challenges in safeguarding cultural heritage. Their legal systems impose penalties for violations; however, enforcement and institutional capacity remain limited, particularly in rural areas where illicit excavation and trafficking are prevalent. France and Germany, as European Union (EU) member states, feature wellestablished frameworks for protecting cultural heritage. France emphasizes stringent penalties under its Code du patrimoine, reflecting the country’s deep cultural pride. Germany, through the Kulturgutschutzgesetz (Cultural Property Protection Act), integrates international conventions and employs advanced measures to combat trafficking, including customs control and extensive inventories of protected artifacts. A key difference lies in enforcement mechanisms. Moldova and Ukraine, while parties to international conventions such as the UNESCO 1970 Convention, often lack the resources for effective application. In contrast, France and Germany exhibit proactive collaboration with international bodies and maintain specialized institutions for cultural heritage preservation. This comparative analysis highlights the necessity of aligning national laws with international standards, strengthening enforcement mechanisms, and fostering cross-border cooperation to protect cultural heritage effectively. The study concludes by advocating for legislative refinement and capacity-building in Moldova and Ukraine to mirror the exemplary practices of France and Germany. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Technical University of Moldova en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject criminal liability en_US
dc.subject cultural heritage protection en_US
dc.subject legislative frameworks en_US
dc.subject international conventions en_US
dc.subject enforcement mechanisms en_US
dc.title Comparative analysis of criminal liability in the Republic of Moldova, Germany, Ukraine, and France in the field of cultural heritage en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account